He Fought The Law and The law Lost

Da CLIK!

Charges dismissed against Md. man who taped traffic stop

A Harford County Circuit Court judge Monday dismissed wiretapping charges against Anthony Graber, a motorcyclist who was jailed briefly after he taped a Maryland state trooper who stopped him for speeding on I-95. Graber used a camera mounted on his helmet, then posted the video on YouTube.

In April, a few weeks after the traffic stop, Harford County state's attorney Joseph I. Cassilly charged Graber, a staff sergeant in the Maryland Air National Guard and a computer systems engineer, with violating the state's wiretapping law. That law dates back to the 1970s and was originally intended to protect citizens from government intrusions into their privacy. If convicted on all charges, Graber faced up to 16 years in prison.

Judge Emory A. Pitt Jr. had to decide whether police performing their duties have an expectation of privacy in public space. Pitt ruled that police can have no such expectation in their public, on-the-job communications.

Pitt wrote: "Those of us who are public officials and are entrusted with the power of the state are ultimately accountable to the public. When we exercise that power in public fora, we should not expect our actions to be shielded from public observation. 'Sed quis custodiet ipsos cutodes' ("Who watches the watchmen?”)."

Graber was also charged with possessing a “device primarily useful for the purpose of the surreptitious interception of oral communications" -- referring to the video camera on his helmet. The judge disagreed with the prosecutor that the helmet cam was illegal, and concluded the state's argument would render illegal “almost every cell phone, Blackberry, and every similar device, not to mention dictation equipment and other types of recording devices."

Pitt's decision is the first ruling in Maryland to address the legality of citizens taping police in the course of their duties. Because it is a circuit court ruling, it is not binding on other judges. However, unless it is appealed, said Graber's attorney, David Rocah of the ACLU of Maryland, "it is likely to be the last word" on the matter and to be regarded as precedent by police.

No word yet on whether the state's attorney will try to appeal the decision. Graber still faces traffic charges stemming from the incident.

By Annys Shin | September 27, 2010; 5:16 PM ET

 

I like it! It was the Founders intentions to have the Public be the Watch Dogs! We've just been taught that we have no power, and that those who hold Public Offices are our Masters! I think NOT!

 

unbelievable!!! In his testimony the officer omitted the fact that he drew his weapon on him and you can see in the video that he quickly holsters it when the marked cruiser approaches the scene. He also states that the guy attempted to flee by backing up and revving his engine above idle, which in the video you can clearly hear his bike is at idle the whole time he is approached. That's the reason he pressed charges... the video showed the officer being the asshole he really is!

 

Agreed! The charges were obviously a BS job meant to cover the ass of a LEO who was about as professional as Pee Wee HERMAN and get the guy who embarrassed him. Be nice if the persecutor (No, it's spelled as I mean it) and LEOs who played this crap were nailed for misconduct and abuse of authority.

 

When I read about this when it happened I thought the LEO & AG were being dicks. The judge proved they were or are. Good for Mr. Graber and the rest of us.

 

I would like to see the video of him blasting past the cop on the highway

 

Heard about this when it first came out and glad to hear that he won the case. Total BS charges and cop was out of line.