VFR800 vs CBR1000RR

F it get a cruiser.....theres your comfort........JK
Its all up too you brutha. choose one...but choose wisely....

 

Good post ,+1

Plasma.

 

Bull shit is all I can say.

 

Note: the 2008 and newer CBR 1000s are way easier to ride that prior models.

 

I have both a 2004 VFR and a 2007 CBR1000RR Repsol edition. Other than to exercise the CBR I almost pick the VFR. It's the first bike I've ever had with saddlebags, duh, what was I thinking? Also, I don't like rolling up the miles on the CBR. I got kneedragging out of my system years ago.

 

+3

But in the end its the OP's choice.

Liter bikes are a thing of their own brother. Apples and oranges in your VFR800 to CBR1000 question.

BZ

 

I was in the same boat in getting my VFR. CBR1000 was also on the list. They were willing to deal more on the VFR, plus it was a close riding position to the 95CBR900 that I traded in on.

Comfy, can carry items, good for long rides. Still a sport bike, but not crazy.

 

:frown::frown::frown::frown::frown:

 

When I first got my VFR I was a little disappointed in the power. It's no CBR 954 (my other bike). After I did a track day I got lazy putting my CBR back to street duty (taped lights, removed signals, etc) so I started riding the VFR more. The more I rode it the more I wanted to ride it. I took it to my parents' house 2+ hours away and loved that trip. The CBR would have left my ass sore for the next day.

I did another track day on the CBR which is an awesome track bike. I applied the skills learned to the VFR and I am finding the VFR a much better street bike. The power is almost linear with the throttle position, which is both nice and a little disconcerting. I find myself banging up against the rev limiter all the time!

Anyway, if I had to have one bike it would be the VFR. I am glad have have the CBR for the track. If I wreck the CBR it's no big deal. I really don't want to trash the VFR.

If I ever go back to the Deals Gap area, I will definitely take the VFR as it's 4-5 hours away. :thumbsup:

 

Ok Benny I might have been a little harsh. JIM

 

+1:thumbsup:

 

I don't mind the riding position of the CBR at all, but it does have a sucky seat.

The stock seat is really hard on passengers. I think this mostly due to the rather stiff suspension compared to the VFR.

 

Start saving. You might as well get both. My next one will be a CBR but I am keeping the VFR. You just can't beat the reliability of the VFR. I am coming up on 87,000km on my 06. It runs great and I have had some long rides on it. I mean long. But I need more power too. Just cause. "need" in my case has a similar meaning as "want"

 

Lots of good points above. (And some heat, too. :flamer

As others said, it comes down to how you plan to ride it, plus a few other factors that might matter to you. Both bikes have won 'Motorcycle of the Year' honors, and are well-regarded by knowledgeable riders everywhere.

Factor - Winner (in no particular order):
Handling - CBR
Braking - CBR
Weight - CBR
Comfort - VFR
Fuel economy - VFR should be better by 3-5 mpg
Insurance cost - VFR
Theft target - CBR (much more desirable bike for thieves, especially pros)
Modification possibilities - unsure, but I know VFRs have some nice mods available
Touring capability - VFR, especially w/the OEM hard bags attached
Stability - VFR
2-up riding - VFR
Power - CBR
Ease of maintenance - VFR, by virtue of centerstand and single-sided swingarm
Parts availability - VFR, since the 6th gen. has been made since '02
Sexiness - purely subjective, but overall I'd say CBR
Overall looks - again it's subjective, but VFR w/it's SSSA and underseat exhausts
Long 1-day rides - VFR
Tire tread life - VFR (100 hp make for slower wear-and-tear on rear tire)
Likelihood of attracting LEOs' attention - CBR
Accessories - VFR
Tank capacity/range - VFR (5.8 gal. vs. CBR's 4.7. gal tank)
Reliability - they're both Hondas, but VFRs are known to last forever
Versatility - VFR
All-around streetbike - VFR
Fuel octane/cost - VFR takes 87 octane (US) and I think the CBR takes 91 or 92

 

As others have stated, it all comes down to what you want and need out of a bike. The VFR is simply a more practical bike for everyday riding that offers sport capabilities and will get you anywhere quickly, reliably, and comfortably.

I faced a tough decision when I picked up my VFR this year. I knew that I wanted something more sporty than the cruiser that I had and the only reason I had the cruiser was to be a starter bike. When I started searching it came down to two bikes. I had a choice between a beautiful 2003 Aprilia Mille RSVR for $3500, or the 2004 VFR for $5300. I was torn. I'd been on the Aprilia, knew what it was capable of... the feel, the sound, the thrill. It also came with the benefit of a 2300 mile ride home to get very very acquainted with her.

But I also knew that I needed some touring capabilities. I ride my bike everywhere. And I do mean everywhere. When I had a job, I would tote computers around strapped to the pillion or backpack, various items in the saddlebags, and the laptop in the backpack. Eventually it came down to the fact that a full sport bike just wasn't practical for everyday use. I don't have the money at this point in my life to have two bikes, but it will come. Then I will get the full sport bike. Until then, my VFR does me very well. I hang with anyone in the twisties, I cruise comfortably, and now that I have my hard bags I have plenty of storage. Its super reliable, beautiful, and cheap to drive (maintenance and insurance).

I'm happy I chose the VFR and don't think I would have had it any other way since I'm limited to one bike for the time being and I don't look back leaving the Aprilia behind (it helps I can hop on one any time I want to lol). The time will come when the stable can grow. Even after it does, the VFR will continue to be the prime steed and will probably exist in the stable long after many others have come and gone.

I don't think I'm being biased here either. I've ridden more that my fair share of bikes in the few years I've been riding. From the lowly 39HP Shadow VLX to the 178RWHP Ducati 999r with the Harley's, Triumphs, Suzuki's, Yamaha's, and Honda's all in the mix, I can honestly say that I've been on about every type of road bike out there and all of them do their one thing exceptionally to very well. However none of them that I've been on do EVERYTHING very well as the VFR does. It's nice to be able to go out, twist the throttle all the way, and have the front wheel come up almost as fast as you can think. Its nice to be able to go out and twist the throttle all the way and have a rumble as the bike takes off comfortably as you enjoy the scenery. Its nice to be able to go out and drag pieces of the bike on the ground or reach out and drag your hand going around a corner at 70MPH. It is nice to be able to do this on different types of bikes. Its even better to do it all on the same bike and not have to spend a fortune on different toys to do different tasks. It is wonderful to own a VFR.

 

Randy WOW thats some serious KM's for a 06 :thumbsup::thumbsup:

 

I'd go with the VFR because I have seen excellent riders on VFR's ride MUCH faster than good riders on hyper-bikes. The VFR has so many hats it is comfortable wearing. I had a VFR, then it was totalled, then purchased an RC-51. While the RC was certainly fun, and sounded better than the VFR IMO, it got real old going up HWY 1 to Monterey (~100 miles) when you knew you had to drag yourself back after being so darn tired. With the VFR, it's up to Monterey, a nice lunch, then enough energy to tear up the road coming back. 200 + miles is very doable on the VFR, but can be a LONG day on a hyper-bike, like the CBR1000RR. BTW, on the VFR I have put in multiple 800+ mile days across the country. I would never try this on a CBR1000RR.

Either way you're in for lots of fun!!

VFRMike.

 

OMG , your not a youngster any more!! you don't need that kind of power for an old buzzard.

i may have to get some advice from Dear randy on this one

 

:cheersaf::grouphug:eace:

 

Two things to look at. How do you picture yourself as a rider? Fast, sporty, always sunny and warm? Now be honest with yourself, how do you really ride? Mostly to and from work, get caught in the rain, short trips, long trips, canyon carving, track days etc.

If you drop the fantasy of how you think you will ride and really focus on the reality of how you really ride you can't help but make the right decision. If you are honest with yourself you will pick the right bike.

Good luck with you new bike whichever it may be!

Maggot