Welcome to VFRworld.com! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

performane difference between 700 and 750 2nd gen

Discussion in '1st & 2nd Generation 1983-1989' started by rcfoggy, Sep 25, 2011.

  1. FoothillRyder

    FoothillRyder New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Messages:
    657
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Sierra Foothills
    'Facts' and 'Proof' ...

    Sheesh ...

    Are you suggesting that the perceived difference in performance is due to something other than the increase in displacement?

    Seems to me that's really unlikely. So unlikely that the suggestion is ludicrous.
     


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #21
  2. tinkerinWstuff

    tinkerinWstuff Administrator Staff Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    7,831
    Likes Received:
    91
    Location:
    Colorado Front Range
    Did you not bother to read or simply unable to comprehend post #17?
     


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #22
  3. FoothillRyder

    FoothillRyder New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Messages:
    657
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Sierra Foothills
    Yeah, I read post #17. Just read it again to make sure I understood it the first time. What post #17 suggests is that his carbs were screwed up before he changed the displacement (a wild ass guess), and are now somehow better after the displacement increased (another WAG). The only 'facts' I see in this thread are the claimed horsepower numbers which show an 11hp difference between the two displacements.

    My question remains the same, and so does my conclusion.
     
    Last edited: Oct 2, 2011


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #23
  4. camo

    camo New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    The Heartland
    Actually the carbs on my bike were stock. The 700 started and ran fine. The 750 starts and runs fine. I doubt if there is a significant difference in the carburation required. I threw this out in case you need a motor and have a choice between the 700 and 750.

    Apparently some think that 700=750.
     


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #24
  5. tinkerinWstuff

    tinkerinWstuff Administrator Staff Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    7,831
    Likes Received:
    91
    Location:
    Colorado Front Range
    What it suggests, is that the guy changed more than one thing at a time and therefor cannot support the claim that all the gains are from the displacement. Carbs don't have to be "screwed up" to not be at peak performance. If you look at the Cam Change thread shown in my signature, you'll see more information along the lines of what I'm talking about. He said the bike ran "fine". You can be four stops from ideal jetting and still run fine but have several HP difference and the time it takes to develop peak HP can be different by seconds.

    See above. Stock jetting is not always "ideal". Every bike of the same model will not run at it's peak on the same jetting. Altitude, compression, accessories, even temperature and barometric pressure on a given day. Even just de-snorkel your airbox and potentially affect the air/fuel mixture.

    So again; sure I can believe there may be a noticeable difference between a 750 and a 700. How MUCH of a difference, if both the 700 and the 750 are tuned and running at peak performance is still debatable.
     
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2011


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #25
  6. FoothillRyder

    FoothillRyder New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Messages:
    657
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Sierra Foothills
    ... and I disagree. Based on (again) the only 'facts' presented here, the difference is 11 horsepower. Got any facts to debate against that?

    I didn't think so.
     


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #26
  7. tinkerinWstuff

    tinkerinWstuff Administrator Staff Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    7,831
    Likes Received:
    91
    Location:
    Colorado Front Range
    I heard that the PAIR valve and snorkel mod are worth at least like 15hp
     


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #27
  8. rcfoggy

    rcfoggy New Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Fairfield Ohio
    Respect all your opinions

    There is a noticeable difference between between the 700 and 750. When honda set the 24 hour endurance record that was held by suzuki ,both the 700 and 750 set records,both bikes were tuned by honda.the 750 was faster,but the 700 was no slouch. I started this thread because of what i read as the respective hp of both units,I found it hard to believe a 20+ difference.
    After a lot of fact finding I found my answer,11 hp is more realistic,
    In 86 I bought a 750 from the dealer for whom I was the service mgr.At that time I rode both ,and yes, You could feel the difference.I pulled the cams out and sent them to kaz yoshima and had them reground,It Was a blast to ride.
    Now,About the dyno,it is a great tuning tool but not an absolute.You may dyno your bike one day and with a 10-15 degree change your information is not relative,as was stated temp change effects jetting.
    Thank all of you for your input.
    Gary
     


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #28
  9. tinkerinWstuff

    tinkerinWstuff Administrator Staff Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    7,831
    Likes Received:
    91
    Location:
    Colorado Front Range
    Amen. Same as I said earlier.

    I'd be more interested in how the two torque curves compared. 11 peak HP is a bullshit number that says little about how the two motors really compare.
     


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #29
  10. rcfoggy

    rcfoggy New Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Fairfield Ohio
    dyno numbers

    I would like to see the numbers too.reality is that the 750 will walk away from the 700.just like to know how much it takes to do that.

    Gary
     


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #30
  11. tinkerinWstuff

    tinkerinWstuff Administrator Staff Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    7,831
    Likes Received:
    91
    Location:
    Colorado Front Range
    theoretically, I'd expect that 700 to have a better or very similar top end and the 750 to have more torque in the RPM range that most people operate
     


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #31
  12. Dukiedook

    Dukiedook New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    979
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kansas City, USA
    Anyone know off the top of their heads what the oversize bore ring changes on a 750 creates volume wise?
    Did they make hot cams for these bikes to buy off the shelf? Yosh made some or would you have to get them custom made?

    I bet the 750 could be a real screamer if you ported and polished the head, hot cam and overbore.
    Is it possible to bore these out to 1000cc?
     


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #32
  13. camo

    camo New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    The Heartland
    Hi duki The stock bore is 70 mm, 1 mm oversize is 21 ccs of displacement. Wiseco doesnt show any 86 VFR pistons
     


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #33
  14. rcfoggy

    rcfoggy New Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Fairfield Ohio
    cams

    The 750 cams are different than the 700,,You would have to send your cams out to have them redone,they would weld them and then grind a new profile,In 86 when i sent mine to Ontario mt,i believe they sent them to cam motion.You have to send them yours because off the gear drive,but i do not know if they do them anymore
    I read on a different form that someone would custom make a bore kit with a 2 set minimum.kit was over 800 cc.

    p.s.
    good head work always helps

    gary
     


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #34
  15. hopit88

    hopit88 New Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Messages:
    707
    Likes Received:
    8
    I know some guys are experimenting with CBR929 pistons. They are 4mm larger than the 750's yielding 836cc's if I remember correctly. Their only concern is the distance from the top of the wrist pin to the dome. If it works, then you only need a cheap set of used 929 pistons and a GOOD shop that can bore it. You can follow it here...

    96 vfr750 cbr929 pistons???/ - VFR Discussion
     


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #35
  16. tinkerinWstuff

    tinkerinWstuff Administrator Staff Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    7,831
    Likes Received:
    91
    Location:
    Colorado Front Range
    Can't you just swap the cams? find a set from a roached motor and direct swap?
     


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #36
  17. rustedroot

    rustedroot New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2010
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Hamburg NY

    If the Honda Service Manual is correct, the camshafts on the 700 and 750 both share the same Cam Lobe Height profiles for intake and exhaust.

    The difference seems to be in the valve opening position specs. Looks like a 10 degree difference for Intake Valve opening, and 10 degree difference for Exhaust Valve closing.
     


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #37
  18. fredsncoma

    fredsncoma New Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    377
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Gardnerville, Nevada, United States

    I have a set of 1mm over Cosworth high compression forged pistons for an 86 750 sitting in my barn. Did several other motor upgrades back when they were in. I'll post a more complete reply later. but oversize pistons were available one day.
     


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #38
  19. tinkerinWstuff

    tinkerinWstuff Administrator Staff Member

    Country:
    United States
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    7,831
    Likes Received:
    91
    Location:
    Colorado Front Range
    3rd and 4th gen also have different cam timing (and lift) specs when compared to each other as well as California models. They are a direct swap with each other. There is a difference in torque and HP associated with the swap as I've documented on a dyno.

    So I'm forced to wonder how much the cams affect performance on the 2nd gen with only a change in timing.
     


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #39
  20. camo

    camo New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    The Heartland
    Rustedroot: Do they talk about where the lobe centers are on both engines?
     


    This site may contain affiliate links for which VFRworld may be compensated
    #40
Related Topics

Share This Page